Yet Another Helmet Regulatory Article – Where do you stand?


Federal Government Weighs National Helmet Law

Federal helmet laws are coming

Cheryl and I are all for ATGATT….where so you stand?  This topic always is a HOT one and pushes so many buttons…

In a controversial move, a federal task force is set to recommend a sweeping, nationwide mandatory helmet law for all motorcyclists, according to a spokesman for the AMA. The legislation for a national helmet law would be aimed at reducing injuries and deaths, and their concurrent economic impact.

Presently, states set their own helmet laws. In recent years, the trend has been to lift mandatory helmet laws or restrict enforcement to minors. Mandatory helmet use is required by all motorcyclists in 19 states; 27 states have an age requirement; two states have age and insurance requirements, and two states have no restrictions, according to the lobby group, BikersRights.com.

The charged issue represents a freedom of choice to enthusiasts. Medical opinions vary regarding the safety of helmet use, and the potential injury from their use or non-use. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration endorses helmets, believing they reduce crash-related head injuries, a leading cause of death among riders, according to a NHTSA spokesman.

“Motorcyclists would be best served if regulators and legislators focus on programs to prevent motorcycle crashes from occurring in the first place,” said the AMA spokesman. The association recommends the use of all safety equipment, including gloves, proper footwear and a motorcycle helmet certified by its manufacturer to meet DOT standards. Said Wayne Allard, AMA Vice President for Government Relations, “We also believe adults should have the right to voluntarily choose to wear a helmet.”

The Centers for Disease Control appointed the Community Preventive Services Task Force, a 15-member panel assigned to make recommendations to the CDC and Congress regarding preventative services, programs and policies to improve public health. It’s yet to be determined when the recommendation will be released, although the AMA expects the report will be issued “soon” and will urge adoption of a universal helmet law.

The CDC is a federal agency under the Department of Health and Human Services, is headquartered in Atlanta. Its mission is to protect the U.S. from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and domestic. It will be left to lawmakers to determine if not wearing a helmet poses a national heath and safety risk warranting new federal regulations.

“The AMA strongly advocates helmet use, but helmet use alone is insufficient to ensure a motorcyclist’s safety,” said Allard. “There is a broad range of measures that can be implemented to improve the skill of motorcycle operators, as well as reduce the frequency of situations where other vehicle operators are the cause of crashes that involve motorcycles.”

Allard added, “The AMA supports actions that help riders avoid a crash, including voluntary rider education, improved licensing and testing, and expanded motorist awareness programs. This strategy is widely recognized and pursued in the motorcycling community.”

Regarding economic impact, Allard claimed injured motorcyclists are less likely than the general population to use public funds to pay for injuries sustained in crashes, “and are just as likely to be insured as other vehicle operators.” Additionally, motorcyclist injury expenses account for a small fraction of total U.S. health care costs while a smaller portion of these costs is attributable to non-helmeted motorcyclists, according to the AMA.

“In 2000, for example, approximately 1.55 percent of total U.S. health care costs were attributable to all motor vehicle crashes. Motorcyclists involved in crashes represented a miniscule percentage of this figure,” added Allard.

At RideApart, we strongly advocate the use of proper safety gear, including helmets when riding a motorcycle. The consequences of not doing so are simply too high for us to do otherwise. We don’t need a federal law to wear a lid, we are going to wear one anyway. Where do you stand on this issue?

10 thoughts on “Yet Another Helmet Regulatory Article – Where do you stand?

  1. Bob November 9, 2013 / 3:12 PM

    Great posting about bridegroom,Thanks
    I don’t think we need federal laws regulating helmet wearing, I ride ATGATT. We need those other folks for organ donations

  2. Garth November 9, 2013 / 3:12 PM

    If I said I was ATGATT, I would be a liar. I do wear my gear most of the time but i have done short trips around town without it, but NEVER without a helmet. On those time I go without the ballistic gloves boots a jacket I ensure you I am a completely different driver. I am more aware and drive more defensively.

    Where do i stand, well everyone has the right to do what they want but in Canada where I am helping foot your hospital bill, you better be taking precautions.

    I agree that there has to be a larger package dealing with safety. Safety gear can sometimes make the novice rider feel bullet proof. Gear will only help when you have an accident. Having training etc will help prevent the accident in the first place.

    • advgrrls November 9, 2013 / 6:39 PM

      your Penance is accepted lol

  3. Roelof November 9, 2013 / 11:35 PM

    I am an AGATT rider by choice and experience. If anyone chooses to go out without gear I have no problem with that, as long as I don’t have to clean up the mess and they pay for their own healthcare.

    • advgrrls November 10, 2013 / 3:25 AM

      should they pay a higher premium for insurance?

  4. Green fish November 10, 2013 / 5:15 AM

    Part of What makes us Americans is our freedom to choose. That said the concept of wearing all your safety gear is very smart
    For many riders motorcycle is a fashion accessory
    It’s the image of freedom the Cowboy tiding across the plains on his iron horse into the sunset
    The freedom to choose even to choose our stupidity is ingrained in the American way. Many have died to protect this freedom.
    I’m a big believer in a AGATT choose to be protected.
    I will defend your right to be stupid.
    I guess there are bikers and motorcyclists

    • advgrrls November 10, 2013 / 6:01 AM

      I just don’t recall this much passion when it came to seat belt laws and bicycle helmets

  5. twotiretirade November 10, 2013 / 8:41 AM

    “Don’t Tread On Me”, is a phrase that means something to me. Any law that takes away my personal right to choose is a law that eats at my freedom. We need laws, we need stability, we need to keep people from hurting each other but we don’t need laws that corrode our sense of liberty and choice.
    With that said, the medical companies should have the right to cover or not cover head trauma when some yahoo does not wear a helmet. It really is that simple. Same goes with seat belts.

    I wear a helmet b/c it is the smart thing to do but I fully support those who want to make poor choices but they and not the tax payer should not have to suffer for their poor choices.

  6. Kevin Brent November 15, 2013 / 11:22 AM

    I can see it for children, but wet nursing adults is just one more case of too many ‘Feds’ with too much time on their hands. Some of the rules on military bases for adults riding a bicycle, would make Joe Stalin blush in shame…lol

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s